Teen deepfake victim pushes for federal law targeting AI-generated explicit content ( www.nbcnews.com )

Nomecks , 5 months ago

May as well try and regulate using lens flare. If you can make it with desktop levels of computing power it can't be regulated.

girlfreddy , 5 months ago (edited 5 months ago)

Ok. Then implement prison sentences of 15+ yrs if convicted of creating and/or sharing that content.

edit -- I see all the explicit AI creators don't like that idea. Awwwww, that's too bad.

drdiddlybadger , 5 months ago

15 years sounds reasonable especially they're making pornography of a minor and sharing it around.

Nomecks , 5 months ago

Congratulations! You've solved the problem for any criminal who lives in whatever jurisdiction you just made the law! Now fix the problem when the creator is Chinese, Russian, North Korean or anywhere else your law doesn't reach.

DriftinGrifter , 5 months ago (edited 5 months ago)

Be me get falsly accused tried and convicted cuz I own a PC and foss ai image gen software and can't afford more than a public defender 15 years it is on a plea bargain -> see how just upping the punishment winds up with negligible roi and ends up with innocent people going away for a long time to provide the us government with slave labor? I think just upping the penalty is a terrible solution becky
Also how would one know they own deepfakes and not just regular porn that's not enforceable at all

BTW just because you have trash takes doesn't mean we support deepfaked porn not everyone against you is a bad person

Edit: read through your post history and was confused if this is a bot account is everything you do just showing off other peoples articles without providing anything of value?

sleepyTonia , 5 months ago

If I'm not wrong, it's already illegal to even depict minors in a sexual manner in much of the world. I do think we should have specific laws against the impersonation of someone through high technological means; photoshopping their face on someone else's nude body, using generative neutral networks to make it look or sound like they did something criminal or immoral... But do you trust any current government to write such a law in a way that would be effective and wouldn't cause ridiculous amounts of collateral damage?