scytale ,

I’m probably just overthinking it.

Obviously that was the point of the author, but yes it's overthinking it. You can't expect to tell the entire story and multiple complex themes (ecology, politics, the dangers of charismatic figures, etc.) of an 800 page novel into a 2.5 hour film. To successfully adapt an "unadaptable" book and appeal to the lowest common denominator movie-watcher, you need to pick and choose.

In this case, Denis chose the dangers of charismatic/messianic figures as the the central theme of his adaptation. That and the love story between Paul and Chani, the latter of which he gave a bigger role compared to the books. I do agree on some of the author's points and wish the movie included more things from the books, but you can only fit so much into a movie. Hell, they probably could've made just the first book into a trilogy in itself, then Messiah as the fourth and conclusion.

Echo5 ,

Sometimes I wonder why these sorts of films are not made into TV series with hour long episodes. Seems the most fitting format

Lauchs ,

My cynical answer is that much of the public doesn't want a multi hour intellectual exercise. Same reason books don't sell particularly well.

1984 ,
@1984@lemmy.today avatar

Intellectuals are really boring to listen to, yes.

When they write books, they include so much details that it's extreamly boring to read through it all.

Because they enjoy all those details and most people won't care about them.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • movies@lemmy.world
  • test
  • worldmews
  • mews
  • All magazines