Why? What difference would it make? If “grab ‘em by the pussy” didn’t change anyone’s mind, I seriously doubt talking about it more will change anything.
Because it's an objective truth. We should talk about politics more, and people who support misogyny and bigotry should be made to feel bad about it. If it is impolite to discuss politics, the only voices you hear will be the impolite. It's not impolite to be intolerant of hatred and oppression. That's a false equivalence sold by the oppressors.
Part of me agrees. But I feel like the point of the article is to say people should care. That nihilism sometimes triggers my depression.
I think back to who I was a decade ago, and I've grown as a person because people cared and told me I should care and explained why my views needed to improve. It takes a lot, and maybe a lot of people in the US won't give a shit about women and how to believe them, but maybe it changes a few people. Maybe they read Daniel's account and are horrified.
It’s not working for piracy. This would seem to be even more difficult to fight than piracy since it can be done on a computer all by yourself without connecting to any other computer or distributing any files.
Again, the idea isn’t to render it physically impossible to occur or to stop it from ever happening. There’s probably not any law that fits either of those criteria. The point is to make it a crime. It shouldn’t be legal to make realistic nonconsensual porn of another person. If it’s discovered that you’ve done that, there should be legal consequences.
Feminism
Hot
This magazine is not receiving updates (last activity 4 day(s) ago). Subscribe to start receiving updates.