TheConversationUS ,
@TheConversationUS@newsie.social avatar

Research published early in the pandemic on is more likely to include lower quality methods and less likely to adhere to reporting standards than research on other topics in the same journals.

Ultimately, it’s a consequence of a “publish-or-perish” culture in .

Reexamining how rewards its scholars and assesses their scholarship may help it do better in the next pandemic
https://theconversation.com/early-covid-19-research-is-riddled-with-poor-methods-and-low-quality-results-a-problem-for-science-the-pandemic-worsened-but-didnt-create-220635 @academicchatter

Apfel ,

@TheConversationUS @academicchatter Piecemeal tactics against lies.

'For example, the most highly cited public health publication listed on Google Scholar used data from a sample of 1,120 people, primarily well-educated young women, mostly recruited from social media over three days.'

'One study estimated the average time from submission to acceptance of 686 papers on COVID-19 to be 13 days, compared with 110 days in 539 pre-pandemic papers from the same journals.'

Horrific.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • academicchatter@a.gup.pe
  • test
  • worldmews
  • mews
  • All magazines