borncity.com

espentan , to Technology in Microsoft employee accidentally publishes PlayReady code

I guess he was ready to play.

PSA: I'm probably old enough to be your father, let me have my terrible jokes/puns.

c0smokram3r , to Technology in Microsoft employee accidentally publishes PlayReady code
@c0smokram3r@midwest.social avatar

“accidentally” 😉

TimeSquirrel , to Technology in Microsoft employee accidentally publishes PlayReady code
@TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org avatar

I can imagine what they felt like. Like when you accidentally hit "reply all" and send a porn link that was in your clipboard to your entire company while you meant to paste something else.

Squiddly ,

My dad did something similar. My mother in law pointed it out and giggled. I facepalmed

admin ,
@admin@lemmy.my-box.dev avatar

So... What link did you send?

sugar_in_your_tea ,

I'm guessing furries.

ace_garp ,
@ace_garp@lemmy.world avatar
scytale , to Technology in Microsoft employee accidentally publishes PlayReady code

A résumé-generating event for sure.

wjrii ,

"Facilitated open computing initiatives and exercised independent judgment and mastery of social engineering techniques and forum software."

dan , to Technology in Microsoft employee accidentally publishes PlayReady code
@dan@upvote.au avatar

tl;dr there were two leaks: A Microsoft employee had compiler issues and attached the code to a publicly-visible bug report, and Microsoft's public symbol server had debug symbols for the library (which makes it a lot easier to reverse engineer and debug the production build in a debugger).

Did the employee that accidentally leaked it think that the public developer community was an internal bug tracker? Strange. I wonder if Microsoft do actually use the same site for both internal and external bugs and the employee just selected the wrong category when posting. Seems like an unnecessary risk.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • test
  • worldmews
  • mews
  • All magazines