lltnskyc

@lltnskyc@monero.town

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. For a complete list of posts, browse on the original instance.

lltnskyc , to World News in Attacks on Ukraine's nuclear plant put world at risk, IAEA warns

So, are you saying that Ukraine is not bombing the territories occupied by Russia?
And how do you define an "enemy territory"? Because from my definition of "enemy territory", any territory occupied by your enemy, territory on which it resides and controls is "enemy territory"...

lltnskyc , to World News in Attacks on Ukraine's nuclear plant put world at risk, IAEA warns

I did not read that "Ukraine did this attack", as a matter of fact article does not say who attacked it, because they "lack evidence".
It's just the only way I see how one can believe that the attack was done by Russia, is a conspiracy theory that Russia attacks its own territory.
On the other one, Ukraine attacking it is perfectly logical because they are attacking a territory of their enemy that they do not control.

lltnskyc , to World News in Attacks on Ukraine's nuclear plant put world at risk, IAEA warns

This is correct from the viewpoint of Ukraine (and its allies)!
But according to Russia and Russian laws - it is Russian territory now.
According to the facts, it is fully controlled by Russia for 2 years now (are you arguing with that?).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_annexation_of_Donetsk,_Kherson,_Luhansk_and_Zaporizhzhia_oblasts_of_Ukraine
Note that we are not talking about whether it is legal by international law, whether it's recognized by the rest of the world, etc. The fact is according to Russia it is Russian territory, and the fact is that it has full control over it. And so we are getting back to my question

you would rather believe a conspiracy theory (or what else would you call that?) that Russia is repeatedly (!) attacking itself, it’s own territory that it controls for more than 2 years, than that Ukraine is attacking the territory of its enemy?

lltnskyc , to World News in Attacks on Ukraine's nuclear plant put world at risk, IAEA warns

The article does not say otherwise.
The article says

The remote-controlled nature of the drones that have attacked the plant means that it is not possible to determine who launched them

So you would rather believe a conspiracy theory (or what else would you call that?) that Russia is repeatedly (!) attacking itself, it's own territory that it controls for more than 2 years, than that Ukraine is attacking the territory of its enemy?

lltnskyc , to World News in Attacks on Ukraine's nuclear plant put world at risk, IAEA warns

Yes, I did. What part of my comment makes you think otherwise?

lltnskyc , to World News in Attacks on Ukraine's nuclear plant put world at risk, IAEA warns

What exactly did I read the wrong way 'round?

lltnskyc , to World News in Attacks on Ukraine's nuclear plant put world at risk, IAEA warns

bring NATO into the war

[it?] should at that point

That said, attacking the power plant is a red line for me. That is an attack on the world.

Are you suggesting that NATO joins Russia in fighting Ukraine due to Ukraine doing "an attack on the world"? I don't see this happening..
Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant was seized and is controlled by Russia for more than 2 years now. So the attacks are coming from Ukrainian side. You do understand that, do you?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • random
  • test
  • worldmews
  • mews
  • All magazines
    •