Nonilex , to random
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

Judge has DENIED the request by ’s team for a limited to stop him from claiming that the was trying to him when they executed a search at when searching for .

Cannon says they didn’t “meaningfully confer” w/ ’s lawyers prior to submitting the request.

Nonilex , to random
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

filed court papers Fri asking a judge to order not to make any further incendiary claims suggesting that agents were “complicit in a plot to him.”
In the filing to US Dist Judge , Smith argues Trump’s statements earlier this wk exposed FBI agents involved in the case “to the risk of threats, violence, & harassment.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/05/24/special-counsel-trump-fbi-order/

StephenRamirez , to random
@StephenRamirez@universeodon.com avatar

When Justice Sonia Sotomayor asked Donald Trump’s lawyer, “If the president decides that his rival is a corrupt person, and he orders the military or orders someone to him, is that within his official acts for which he can get ?”, he replied, “It would depend on the hypothetical, but we can see that would well be an official act.” Based on that one line of questioning, Trump’s argument should be going down in flames 9-0. A democracy cannot survive when its supreme leader can arbitrarily decide that it’s in the nation’s best interest to rub out his opponents, and then leave it to some future court to decide whether it was an official act, because he’ll get away with it as long as there aren’t 67 votes in the Senate to impeach. And given that it will have been established that the president can put out a contract on political foes, how many senators are going to vote to impeach? — Brynn Tannehill

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • test
  • worldmews
  • mews
  • All magazines