Nonilex , to random
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

In an opinion essay in The WSJ, Justice responded to questions about his travel to a fishing trip w/a who frequently has cases before the hours before the ProPublica article was published.

The justice wrote he was not required to the trip or himself from his benefactor’s cases.


https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/21/us/politics/justice-alito-luxury-travel-fishing-trip.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

mkoek ,
@mkoek@mastodon.nl avatar

@Nonilex “the rules allow me to keep stuff like this secret” is not a great defense

MaggyWells ,
@MaggyWells@mastodon.social avatar

@Nonilex what an entitled arrogant jerk.

Nonilex , to random
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

Billionaire Bought Property From . The Justice Didn’t Disclose the Deal

The is the first known instance of flowing from Crow to the justice. The sale netted the two vacant lots & the house where Thomas’ was living (& still is).

by Justin Elliott, Joshua Kaplan and Alex Mierjeski
@ProPublica

https://www.propublica.org/article/clarence-thomas-harlan-crow-real-estate-scotus

mennodeij ,
@mennodeij@mastodon.social avatar

@Nonilex @ProPublica so, like, sold his own mother? Bloody typical

18+ yacc143 ,
@yacc143@mastodon.social avatar

@Nonilex @ProPublica

You are not looking at it from the libertarian Koch network standpoint.

SCOTUS justices sell the service of ruling in your favour, in a kind of freemium model.

Want a ruling based on the constitution bla bla bla, go with the free service model. Want the premium service model, with guaranteed outcomes, well, then you have to pay for it.

Calling it a bribe is so very last century, it's a premium service fee.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • test
  • worldmews
  • mews
  • All magazines