Nonilex , to random
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

Superior Court Judge Scott determined ’s fmr partner & divorce lawyer must tell the court what he knows about special prosecutor ’s relationship w/ DA – a decision that could produce more bombshell testimony as defense attorneys seek to disqualify the DA from prosecuting the case.

https://www.ajc.com/news/watch-live-terrence-bradley-testifies-on-fani-willis-nathan-wade-relationship/FDLUQWVCL5A4RFBZKJDO7Y35FM/

Nonilex OP ,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

disqualification hearing 🧵

, who is atty ’s husband & also repping Michael Roman, is at the podium for argument.
He stated he would address the issue he says.
(will refer to as & now)
will deal w/ & statements made to & on the court & Willis' book.

Nonilex OP ,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

: was DQed by JudgeMcBurney (she was supporting oppo of BurtJones, LtGov & target of investigation) & tells Judge to use the "" standard.
JMerchant says "appearance of conflict" standard must be used, but admits that there is law in GA that says "actual conflict of interest".
McAfee: What is the "personal interest"?
JMerchant: It isn't defined by but here Willis has a personal financial interest from the scheme she set up.

Nonilex OP ,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

: I agree w/the State that the conflict cannot be speculative, but we have a concrete here. has a very personal interest.

JMerchant: Prosecutors should avoid an appearance of impropriety.

JMerchant: Re: how to determine a personal interest: "You know it when you see it."

JMerchant: E.G. of another case of a conflict is when a DA is a witness in a case, he is DQ'd & his entire office is DQ'd.

[neither are witnesses or parties, they are prosecuting attys]

Nonilex OP ,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

: awarded a contract to her boyfriend after dating him for 2 yrs [acc/to defense witness testimony] & then went on personal trips w/him. Even if Willis reimbursed Wade in cash, she has received a personal financial benefit of $9200 in this case.

: Should there be an immateriality requirement here?

JMerchant: No. Even if it was $6 it is still disqualifying.

McAfee: So there is a continuum involved here?

JMerchant: the court must do a fact-based analysis.

Nonilex OP ,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

: The court has to look at it globally & consider all of the witnesses & all of the facts & to evaluate credibility as a factfinder.

: You cannot give a dollar amount & look no further?

JMerchant: There is no on this so I can’t answer that.

JMerchant: isn't a disinterested person when it comes to this proceeding.

Nonilex OP ,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

then defends his wife’s, , credentials: My wife was called a liar. The text msgs prove everything she put into that motion. She verified w/[Bradley] what she put into the filing.

: How does the timing of the relationship impact the financial interest?

JMerchant: she appointed for him to get the money. created the scheme & didn't tell anyone about it. They hid it & tried to create an excuse by saying it happened after the fact.

Nonilex OP ,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

: There is no paper trail for the cash. A public ofcl is required to keep track of gifts.

: Does the lack of fall on the State? Isn't that where burdens come in?

JMerchant: Yes they had the obligation to tell you where the money went. & concocted the cash excuse together b/c you cannot rebut it.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • test
  • worldmews
  • mews
  • All magazines