There were talks of a truce a couple weeks ago, but during negotiations, Hamas decided to fire another wave of rockets at Tel Aviv. Clearly they aren’t interested in the idea.
Thousands of marchers descended on Washington DC on Saturday to call for a permanent ceasefire in Gaza and to protest US aid to Israel, more than three months into an Israeli offensive against Hamas that is killing 250 Palestinians per day, according to the Oxfam charity.
A similar, British event took place in London earlier in the day, attended by thousands including the giant, well-traveled Syrian puppet Little Amal, representing refugees and displaced people, only recently back from a high-profile visit to the US-Mexico border.
One of the organizing groups in Washington, the Council on American-Islamic Relations, said on Friday that they had sent a letter to the White House calling on the president to secure a “complete and verifiable ceasefire”, the release of all hostages in Gaza and political prisoners in Israel, and the termination of unconditional US financial and diplomatic support for the Israeli government.
Among those addressing the crowd in Washington, by video link, was Al Jazeera journalist Wael al-Dahdouh, whose wife, daughter, two sons and a grandchild were killed by Israeli airstrikes.
Speaking at the rally, Taher Herzallah, the director of outreach for American Muslims for Palestine, said the conflict in Gaza had given the people of the global south the clarity to “rise together in unison”.
“Who would have known that the mighty people of Yemen would challenge the empires of the world,” he added, referring to the Houthi attacks on international shipping in the Red Sea that have led to two nights of retaliatory strikes by the US and UK.
The original article contains 922 words, the summary contains 256 words. Saved 72%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
“Who would have known that the mighty people of Yemen would challenge the empires of the world,” he added, referring to the Houthi attacks on international shipping in the Red Sea that have led to two nights of retaliatory strikes by the US and UK.
This does not sound like somebody interested in promoting peace.
Completely agree. I'm as against the Israeli terror campaign in Gaza as the next guy, but come on. Iran-backed terrorists attacking random cargo ships is hardly a basis for progress.
Whilst I understand that, you could argue that that is exactly why both sides need to sit down and talk.
This cannot go on for ever, at some point both sides have to accept violence will never be the answer. What's happened (terrible as it is) has happened and we can never go back in time to change it.
The only way violence will work is the total eradication of one side or the other. That can never be the right path to go down.
We can all sit here online and say we'll never talk to terrorists, Margaret Thatcher made a great public speech with that line yet it turns out our government had channels open all the time.
I have no answer as whoever tries to step in usually has their own interests at heart.
UN maybe? Then again others will vote against whoever their current 'enemy' is purely because they can. For instance Russia will never back anything put forward by the US, and vice versa.
