I run copilot-equivalent things locally for code autocomplete and suggestions. It's about even in terms of language specific snippets in terms of productivity gains there.
I've run my resume through it to have it inject HR buzzwords into all my bullet points, and i think it looks much better as a result. (The AI is way more flattering about my work that I am, myself). For something like ChatGPT specifically, i hand it my resume along with job listings and have it rate my fit, give explanations as to why, and highlight areas the company would like to know about, which makes writing cover letters trivial.
Nvidia has an AI feature that guesses and fills in frames, making it so a game only needs to generate about 30fps to get the user equivalent of 120fps, drastically improving performance on both low and high end machines even adding in the cost of running the neural net.
You're limiting your view of "AI" into what enters the news cycle, and like most things in the news cycle, they're almost completely off the mark and more focused on the doom and gloom aspects.
My future career is perfectly gears towards integrating AI into people's normal workflow so people can work with the accelerating affects of technology, instead of feeling replaced by it.
All that being said, jobs like screenwriters have good reason to be worried. Even a bad AI can make a better script that 80% of what comes out of hollywood these days.