FinishingDutch ,
@FinishingDutch@lemmy.world avatar

I’ve got solar panels on my roof, and being Dutch windmills are in my blood. But I’m also not blind to the reality that both wind and solar will only get you so far. And there’s already a lot of opposition to wind farms - they ruin the view, endanger birds and there’s health concerns due to noise and shadow projection.

If we just build even one nuclear powerplant, we could basically just… not do wind. And we’d have pleeeenty of power for the coming energy transition, change to electric vehicles, etc.

But noooo… nuclear is scary. Especially to the people who only cite Fukushima and Chernobyl in regards to safety. That’s the same as banning air travel because of 9/11 and the Tenerife disaster. Nuclear power is safe, cheap and we owe it to the planet to use it wisely instead of more polluting alternatives.

henfredemars ,

You know what’s scary? The existential threat of climate change.

FinishingDutch ,
@FinishingDutch@lemmy.world avatar

Absolutely that’s scary. Heck, we’re seeing the effects of it every day. If more nuclear means less coal and other polluting options, I’m all for it.

Kecessa ,

Are you really saying that to a Dutch? They are the first ones that get affected by rising sea levels, don't worry, they know it's scary.

bstix ,
Forester OP ,
@Forester@yiffit.net avatar

Its cheaper than climate change.

Broken_Monitor ,

The number of people who still think nuclear is bad and solar / wind will make up for it is really depressing. We could have had an unrivaled nuclear power infrastructure but those NIMBY assholes stopped it 50 years ago and now we rely on extending existing plants past their lifetimes while running in fucking circles about how to save the planet. Has anyone who wants to “go green” without nuclear ever looked at the power output of these things?? It’s not even the same league! AaagggghHhHhhhhhhhh

IchNichtenLichten ,
@IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world avatar

Please provide valid sources to back up your comment. Thanks.

MrVilliam ,

I'll be a source. I worked at Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant in MD for over 10 years. Because of the trend of shutting down nuclear, I shifted over to operating a combined cycle power plant. Calvert with 2 units did about 1800MW combined, base loaded 24/7 except for outages, and those were staggered so that when one went down for maintenance and refueling, the other unit was still throwing 900MW to the grid. My current plant has 2 gas engine turbines and 1 STG, and on a good day when we're fully up 2x1 with ducts in, we can hit about 800MW when it's called for. Balls to the wall in perfect conditions on a plant that's not even ten years old, we can't do half of what Calvert was doing and they've been operating since the 70s.

Imagine what modern nuclear tech could do. We should've been a step ahead of everybody with this.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
  • test
  • worldmews
  • mews
  • All magazines