This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. For a complete list of posts, browse on the original instance.
This magazine is not receiving updates (last activity 6 day(s) ago). Subscribe to start receiving updates.
A former North Dakota lawmaker who was one of the most powerful members of the Legislature has signed a plea agreement with federal prosecutors on a charge that he traveled to Europe with the intent of paying for sex with a minor.
Lawyers for president’s son say Delaware court did not have jurisdiction over case when it proceeded to trial
A new Louisiana law requires all public schools in the state to display the Ten Commandments in classrooms. But civil liberties groups say this violates the First Amendment of the US constitution.
This lawsuit might be a long shot, but it’s not completely a foregone conclusion at this point. The state of Illinois has tougher privacy laws than most states, which may factor into the judge’s decision. On the other hand, this lawsuit — filed by two Illinois residents with the assistance of the Liberty Justice Center —...
Meta managers are accused of retaliation and covering up mistreatment of women....
Christopher Bauer's arrest came amid a reckoning in which the FBI pledged to crack down on sexual misconduct
The Oklahoma Supreme Court has dismissed a lawsuit of the last two survivors of the 1921 Tulsa Race Massacre who were seeking reparations.
Some of the world's largest aircraft lessors faced off against their insurers in a Dublin courtroom on Tuesday at the start of a months-long battle over around 2.5 billion euros ($2.7 billion) of insurance claims related to jets stranded in Russia.
Landmark verdict against Chiquita marks first time major US company held liable for funding human rights abuses abroad
Verdict comes after week-long trial in Biden family home town of Wilmington, Delaware
A year ago, Walled Culture wrote about an extremely important case that was being considered by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), the EU’s top court. The central question was whether the judges considered that copyright was more important than privacy.
