johncarlosbaez ,
@johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz avatar

@RanaldClouston @bookstodon

"With its typographical tricks, maddening digressions, and insistence on exposing its own artifice, Tristram Shandy seems closer to the fourth-wall–shattering metafictions of Borges or Nabokov, or to the stream-of-consciousness wanderings of Proust or Woolf herself, than to the more conventionally realist fictions of Sterne’s closest contemporaries.

But that raises a question: Just how did something so odd, so out of step with the norms of 18th-century fiction, appear in the first place? It’s easy to imagine Sterne as a lone weirdo tearing apart the rules of narrative art at the very moment his contemporaries were first perfecting them. But the truth is more complicated. Tristram Shandy wasn’t a unique avant-garde masterpiece awaiting the arrival of the 20th century to be appreciated. On the contrary, Sterne’s novel belonged to an already well-established tradition of “experimental” literature—a body of work every bit as formally adventurous as that of Sterne’s “modern” inheritors."

https://slate.com/culture/2016/01/laurence-sternes-tristram-shandy-isnt-as-modern-as-some-critics-believe.html

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • bookstodon@a.gup.pe
  • test
  • worldmews
  • mews
  • All magazines