@skulblaka@sh.itjust.works avatar

skulblaka

@skulblaka@sh.itjust.works

I may or may not be any number of unfathomable beings.

Account migration from @skulblaka after learning the admins of that instance are wankers.

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. For a complete list of posts, browse on the original instance.

skulblaka , to RPGMemes in "How do I make the no-no thing be a yes-yes thing?!"
@skulblaka@sh.itjust.works avatar

  • Can the bread make a will save?

  • No, you're still prone. You used Dimension Slide, not Dimension Rotate.

  • Will a Limited Wish spell prevent you from being brain damaged?

skulblaka , to NonCredibleDefense in NCD in a nutshell about MacArthur.
@skulblaka@sh.itjust.works avatar

🫡

skulblaka , to Reddit in Why didn't we mass edit our comments to sound like this? We could've burned Reddit.
@skulblaka@sh.itjust.works avatar

They have the edit history. All you're really doing is posting a big old flagpole on your comments that says "this account was previously run by a real human being" because bots wouldn't have a reason to edit comments in protest. No matter what you protest-edit to you're only making their job easier. The most effective way to "stick it" to reddit these days is to not interact with it whatsoever.

skulblaka , to politics in Sanders: Supreme Court Is “Out of Control” and Must Be Reformed
@skulblaka@sh.itjust.works avatar

The problem is apparently having someone in office that will live long enough to actually reap what they sow. I didn't used to think this would ever be a thing we'd have to be worried about, but, here we are. Environmental issues in particular hit this note I think.

skulblaka , to World News in 'There Are No Kings in America': Biden Blasts Supreme Court, Issues Dire Warning After Immunity Ruling
@skulblaka@sh.itjust.works avatar

Not really.... It's not that anything he says instantly becomes law, it's only that he can't be charged with committing a crime. It's not a cheat code that lets him create or modify any law because the change or new law just won't be recognized by the government. It isn't a crime, per se, it just gets ignored. Or it gets voted on and the GOP squashes it.

skulblaka , to World News in 'There Are No Kings in America': Biden Blasts Supreme Court, Issues Dire Warning After Immunity Ruling
@skulblaka@sh.itjust.works avatar

Fucking lol,

This entire thread is people giving you answers that range from reasonable to nuanced, and you sticking your fingers in your ears and screaming about how the only options are murder or nothing.

I don't get to pull this quote out very often, so please, feel honored.

What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

skulblaka , to World News in 'There Are No Kings in America': Biden Blasts Supreme Court, Issues Dire Warning After Immunity Ruling
@skulblaka@sh.itjust.works avatar

Trump's election proved that most of America's governmental system was based around a series of "gentlemen's agreements" and an expectation of fair play. America is not resilient to betrayal in any fashion. If one person stops respecting the rule of fair play the entire system crumbles.

skulblaka , to World News in 'There Are No Kings in America': Biden Blasts Supreme Court, Issues Dire Warning After Immunity Ruling
@skulblaka@sh.itjust.works avatar

Moderation isn't in his playbook, he would never just add 4. He'd add 69+ new judges or else just appoint every single GOP congressman as a Supreme Court Judge.

skulblaka , to World News in 'There Are No Kings in America': Biden Blasts Supreme Court, Issues Dire Warning After Immunity Ruling
@skulblaka@sh.itjust.works avatar

The bricks don't deserve that abuse.

skulblaka , to World News in 'There Are No Kings in America': Biden Blasts Supreme Court, Issues Dire Warning After Immunity Ruling
@skulblaka@sh.itjust.works avatar

There's a very important difference here. If you're fascist and rich, things can be done about your crimes. They are still crimes. Just nothing will be done.

A president can now do what he wants and nothing CAN be done about it, period, barring an actual act of Congress.

That's an important distinction.

skulblaka , to politics in Democrats say Trump is an existential threat. They’re not acting like it.
@skulblaka@sh.itjust.works avatar

Name checks out.

Trump hasn't been able to debate past 2004. Every single sentence out of his mouth since before his first 2016 campaign has been either gibberish or lies. I'll take a doddering old man over a pathological liar every time if those are my two options. Not to even mention Trump's extremely obvious dementia and extremely obvious fascist tendencies, racism, sexism, 34 felonies, convicted sex offender, on tape saying he'd like to fuck his daughter, on tape partying with Epstein, on tape committing voter fraud, can't stay awake at his own criminal trial, moans and complains and cries at every little thing that hurts his widdle feewings....

And this is the guy you want running for president?

skulblaka , to World News in 'A Full-Fledged War Crime': Israel Condemned Over New Human Shield Footage
@skulblaka@sh.itjust.works avatar

Hang on... So you aren't going to trust a primary source from a country that doesn't speak English, unless said source is in English? The fuck? Of course it's in fucking Arabic, it was filmed in an Arabic-speaking country. Put it through a translator like the rest of the world did.

skulblaka , to politics in AOC wants to impeach SCOTUS justices following Trump immunity ruling
@skulblaka@sh.itjust.works avatar

I would have preferred that they draw a line on specific acts not being considered "official acts", especially as we draw the line between Trump's presidency and his 2020 reelection campaign. I'm just not seeing a lot of honest discourse as to what this decision actually means from a legal perspective.

Well, that's exactly the problem that has everyone up in arms here. They have made this ruling but conveniently failed to rule on what constitutes an "official" act. Therefore whenever a major ruling has to be done about this, they can decide at that time whether an act was official or not based on what flavor of president they're ruling for or against, and until then the lower courts can take the heat off the SCOTUS directly by just ruling that everything Trump has ever done is legal because he was president once.

It's a very transparently partisan ruling, setting the stage for further partisan ruling in the future by being extremely vague about what their ruling actually is. This ruling boils down to "the president is allowed to do anything he wants when we say so, and is subject to rule of law only when we say so, and whether we say so will be determined after the acts in question." In this way the conservative-packed supreme court can easily enable a conservative president or trap a liberal one.

skulblaka , to NonCredibleDefense in Hammer and firing pin
@skulblaka@sh.itjust.works avatar

Alright this is like the third time I've seen a Whizzbanger in as many days. Who taught y'all about this? This is supposed to be cursed knowledge.

skulblaka , to Lefty Memes in Yep.
@skulblaka@sh.itjust.works avatar

The tree of liberty must be refreshed, from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants.

-Thomas Jefferson

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • random
  • test
  • worldmews
  • mews
  • All magazines
    •