It is very telling to me how the NHS and the BMJ (and various others) are not doing any correction of the anti-trans crowd when they attribute things to the Cass review that it doesn't say.
They are pretty much exclusivley talking about it in terms of debunking criticisms. Not support that draws an incorrect inference.
One thing that is striking to me in my investigation of the #CassReview are some of the undeclared assumptions. One I've seen a lot of people point out—that being trans is inherently bad—but another that I don't see called out as often has been standing out to me:
That being trans is something you become rather than something that you are.
Thus the goal, combined with the previous point, is to prevent people from becoming trans in the first place